Friday, February 06, 2009
Jewelry
I was talking to a friend the other day who likes jewelry - a lot. It was mentioned that fingers feel naked without any flashy addons. Now I would mention a certain necklace that was applied and couldn't be removed for several days because those same naked fingers couldn't find the tiny child proof lock. Child proof lock on a necklace? Why else would they be so hard to unfasten. Heck even us males have trouble unfastening such an apparatus. Threading a needle is easy in comparison.
So I was informed the plan was to get some flash jewelry called rings for those naked fingers. "Cheap jewelry" I was informed. "Cubic Zirconia" I volunteered, trying to sound like I know something about the subject at hand.
"Not that good!" I was told, "something much less than that." "Oh!" was my intelligent remark.
So guys, don't fake it when you are talking about jewelry. And it is probably not a good idea to fake it when you are buying it.
I am analyzing this data. There are different classes of jewelry. Ordinary jewelry is expensive and flashy looking. Cubic Zirconia is flashy, less expensive, but not that expensive. Then there is another class - or two that is still more less expensive. (More less expensive means cheap - I think.) But it still looks flashy and I think only the female gender is allowed to buy that.
-=One Day At A Time=-
This work by NSCAVE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
Post a Comment
What's your take? Agree? Disagree? Comment!